I can certainly understand why the Scottish Government would not want to be associated with this folly. As, I suspect, can Andrew Tickell. People should read his recent article in the Sunday National (https://www.thenational.scot/news/18669686.crowdfunded-indyref2-court-bid-may-bad-waste-good-cash/). | Scottish Government pulls out of Section 30 People’s Action court case | The National https://www.thenational.scot/news/18673030.scottish-government-pulls-section-30-peoples-action-court-case/?action=success#comments-feedback-anchor
No level of public support is sufficient to bring about the restoration of Scotland's independence absent a process by which that support can be expressed in an exercise of our democratic right of self-determination. At this time, no such process is in place or in prospect.
Sideways as one? – Peter A Bell https://peterabell.scot/2020/08/23/sideways-as-one/ #NoSection30 #ScottishUDI #UnionNoMore
Who’s panicking? – Peter A Bell https://peterabell.scot/2020/08/22/whos-panicking/ #NoSection30 #ScottishUDI #UnionNoMore
Act to be
The overarching criterion for deciding questions of parliamentary competence is democratic legitimacy, not legality.
It is proven! I am peterabell on Keybase: https://keybase.io/peterabell/sigchain#ef5129a4cd15ed1780b00d028e16bb1281a4a8bb4366b2c093388e44e28638940f
Thinker. Listener. Talker. Reader. Writer. None of my attitudes is immutable. None of my conclusions is final. None of my opinions is humble.